A bitter High Court dispute has broken out between possible neighbours in excess of the development of a wall in a coastal website inside a north Dublin suburb, a circumstance which has attracted countrywide awareness following an Irish Periods report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres on a proposed household dwelling at Sutton Strand, wherever allegations of setting up breaches, environmental considerations, and very long-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled in the courts. The Irish Times post about René Collier as well as the Irish Occasions article about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what started as a local disagreement has developed into a hugely publicised authorized fight.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing about design is effective at the location on Dublin Street, Sutton, in which Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a physician and a firm director respectively, request to make their spouse and children dwelling. The case has become emblematic of broader disputes alongside Ireland’s coastline, where development pressures collide with environmental protections as well as the sensitivities of set up residents. In accordance with the Irish Instances report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall getting constructed by their future neighbours goes over and above the boundaries permitted underneath arranging permission.
René Collier and Paul Feely, both equally citizens of Dublin Highway, claim that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the conditions in their planning permission by developing a wall outside of the boundaries in their web page, bringing about an encroachment on a Exclusive Location of Conservation. The SAC designation is central to the dispute, therefore locations are issue to stringent controls underneath European and Irish environmental law. Inside their court docket filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even small encroachments might have Long lasting ecological implications, specially inside a delicate coastal natural environment including Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny They may be in breach of their setting up permission, and say the wall, and that is partly constructed, is in the right position. Their legal workforce has characterised the motion being an try to delay or frustrate a lawful enhancement. The couple accuse litigants of trying to get to halt homebuilding to be able to preserve their perspective, an allegation that has been repeated in court docket and referenced in protection of the situation. This accusation goes to the guts of numerous coastal scheduling disputes, where views of The ocean are both highly prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Occasions report naming René Collier and Paul Feely described dramatic efforts from the plaintiffs to document the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded through ocean in storm to photograph the site, Based on sworn proof referenced during the Irish Situations. In a single account, Rene Collier waded by means of waist-high h2o through a storm to photograph the location Irish Instances, an image that has considering the fact that come to be emblematic with the intensity of the dispute. These steps were not just symbolic; they had been meant to Get visual evidence of the wall’s situation relative to tidal lines and guarded land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the website from the sea Irish Periods noted, describing how The 2 Males entered the h2o throughout intense weather conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading by storm water to photograph the location turned Among the most striking descriptions to emerge from courtroom reporting. The Irish Situations write-up about accountant Paul Feely pointed out that this kind of actions ended up cited to demonstrate the plaintiffs’ belief the wall prolonged into a region affected by tidal movement, strengthening their argument that the SAC was currently being encroached on.
The events at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 had been lined intimately because of the countrywide push. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Times 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Instances January 27 2026 grew to become commonly searched phrases as audience sought to understand the background and implications of the case. On that day, the High Court read further more submissions on no matter whether interim orders really should be granted to halt design pending an entire Listening to. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a essential minute while in the authorized timeline.
With the core in the dispute can be a disagreement above boundaries, organizing compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely sustain that the wall, as constructed, goes beyond what was authorised and intrudes into shielded land. They argue that this is simply not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by career, is described as meticulous in his assessment of arranging documents, maps, and circumstances attached into the authorization.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have each pressured that their action is motivated by issue for environmental safety and adherence to René Collier and Paul Feely preparing regulation. They reject statements that the situation is about preserving A non-public see, insisting instead that it's about ensuring that progress at Sutton Strand respects authorized and ecological limits. In affidavits, they have got described their very long-standing connection to the world as well as their consciousness of its environmental sensitivity.
On one other side, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed by themselves as a pair basically trying to make a family members household in accordance With all the legislation. They deny which the wall encroaches on a Specific Region of Conservation and say that each one is effective have already been performed according to Qualified guidance and accredited designs. Their lawyers have argued the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and the spectacular steps of René Collier and Paul Feely, together with moving into The ocean throughout a storm, usually do not change the underlying specifics.
The case has also elevated broader questions about how setting up disputes are fixed in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter court docket dispute around development of wall at coastal web-site happens to be a shorthand description for any situation that numerous observers see as ever more frequent. As sea amounts rise and coastal erosion intensifies, the specific delineation involving personal land, general public foreshore, and guarded habitats is becoming extra contentious.
The Irish Moments posting about René Collier noted which the businessman experienced Earlier been associated with local advocacy on planning and environmental challenges, though not at this scale. Meanwhile, the Irish Instances post about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how men and women from extremely distinctive Qualified backgrounds can find by themselves aligned in these types of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some experiences spell their names, are getting to be synonymous While using the Sutton Strand situation.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the internet site through the sea Irish Times coverage emphasised, underlining The weird lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded via waistline-high water through a storm to photograph the website Irish Moments and René Collier waded through waist-substantial h2o during a storm to photograph the positioning Irish Periods are phrases that appeared repeatedly in coverage, reflecting the two the Bodily fact from the coastline and the symbolic nature on the act. For supporters from the plaintiffs, these steps shown motivation; for critics, they illustrated the things they see being an abnormal tactic.
Given that the High Court proceedings continue, the end result stays unsure. The court ought to decide whether the wall as developed complies with arranging permission and no matter if any encroachment right into a Unique Area of Conservation has happened. The legal arguments are complicated, involving interpretation of maps, tidal data, and setting up situations. Nonetheless the human factor continues to be central: neighbours who should Reside along with one another lengthy following the legal fees happen to be compensated.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing about building functions at the site on Dublin Street, Sutton, nevertheless the implications of the case prolong past that handle. For planners, developers, and people alike, the dispute serves like a reminder of the importance of clarity in setting up permissions and sensitivity in coastal advancement. It also underscores how promptly a local disagreement can escalate when elementary issues for example environmental protection and house legal rights are perceived to become at stake.
Meanwhile, Sutton Strand continues to be a place of normal beauty and contested boundaries. The wall with the centre of your dispute stands partially crafted, a Bodily manifestation of unresolved authorized questions. Regardless of whether it will ultimately be altered, taken out, or concluded as prepared will depend on the court docket’s findings. Till then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their versions will very likely go on to look in headlines, joined indelibly to Probably the most carefully watched planning disputes in north Dublin in recent times.